Archive for the ‘2010’ Category

This Thursday is Pamela Gorman day over at From the Right Radio. What does this mean? You should read the press release:

Aug 03, 2010 – FTR Radio announced this morning that Thursday, August 5th will be Pamela Gorman Day. Gorman, a former Arizona State Senator, is running for Congress in Arizona’s 3rd District. FTR Radio will dedicate much of its programming Thursday to all things Pamela Gorman.

Thomas LaDuke, Programming Director at FTR Radio said , “We will play interviews with Senator Gorman, as well as spin her favorite music and share some of her best cooking recipes. Senator Gorman is the type of no-nonsense conservative that we need in Congress and we are happy to dedicate Thursday to her.”

“Pamela Gorman is a fighter. I am excited to have FTR Radio dedicate a day to a true conservative-and Pamela Gorman is the right person to send to Congress,” said Paul Croteau, Director of Operations at FTR Radio.

To listen to Pamela Gorman Day on FTR Radio, go to www.ftrradio.com. For more information on Pamela Gorman, visit www.gorman2010.com.

Of course yours truly will be playing an interview with Pamela on In Her Right Mind at 4 P.M. Eastern time.

Remember my friend Pamela Gorman? She’s running for Congress to replace the retiring John Shadegg. I interviewed her and wrote about her.

This week her campaign came up with this gem. I love it.

Go contribute to her campaign. We need more chicks with guts in DC. Every dollar helps!

Just over a year ago, the United States Department of Homeland Security issued a report that warned citizens to be mindful of the violent, racist right-wing extremists that would soon be emerging from the woodwork. That’s Janet Napolitano for you. “The system worked” when a terrorist attempted to set off a bomb in his panties, but by George, watch out for those veterans — they know how to use guns!

Perhaps it would have been more prudent to issue requests that anyone with a conservative point of view kindly keep their mouth shut. Last week, an SEIU (Service Employees International Union) memberattacked a man at a Tea Party protest for having the audacity to try and protect his wife, as the lunatic was about to push her. I can guarantee you that that guy wasn’t a Republican. SEIU doesn’t accept them redneck Republicans.

On Monday a video went viral, thanks to Mike Flynn at Big Government, who posted the anonymous video on the site. About a minute in length, the video shows North Carolina Representative Bob Etheridge assaulting some young men who approached the Congressman to ask him if he supported the Obama agenda.

Read More

This week I chatted with Pamela Gorman, a conservative congressional candidate for Arizona’s 3rd district.

You can also read my write-up on this fabulous lady.

It is quite the primary season for Republican women. Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman have won the Republican primaries in California, for Senator and Governor, respectively. Sharron Angle is poised to face Harry Reid in the Nevada Senate race come November, and Nikki Haley won her gubernatorial primary in South Carolina.

There are other conservative chicks* running for reelection (Michele Bachmann and Marsha Blackburn come to mind), and some like Robin Smith and Pamela Gorman have not yet faced their primaries.

But for the purposes of this post, I want to focus on Pamela Gorman.

I had an opportunity to chat with the GOP babe** recently about her campaign to represent the 3rd district of Arizona in the United States House of Representatives. Solid conservative John Shadegg currently holds that seat, but the Congressman is retiring to spend more time with his family and to do whatever else it is that you do when you retire.

Read More

I interview Matt Friedman, candidate running against liberal Susan Davis in California’s 53rd district.

I love this article. It was written some years ago, but is timeless in America. Keep it in mind when you go the ballot box this election cycle.

By Charlie Reese

(Date of publication unknown)

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don’t write the tax code. Congress does. You and I don’t set fiscal policy. Congress does. You and I don’t control monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president and nine Supreme Court justices – 545 human beings out of the 235 million – are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered but private central bank.

I excluded all but the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it.

No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislation’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

A CONFIDENCE CONSPIRACY

Don’t you see how the con game that is played on the people by the politicians? Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of Tip O’Neill, who stood up and criticized Ronald Reagan for creating deficits.

The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating appropriations and taxes.

O’neill is the speaker of the House. He is the leader of the majority party. He and his fellow Democrats, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetos it, they can pass it over his veto.

REPLACE SCOUNDRELS

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 235 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts – of incompetence and irresponsibility.

I can’t think of a single domestic problem, from an unfair tax code to defense overruns, that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.

When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red. If the Marines are in Lebanon, it’s because they want them in Lebanon.

There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take it.

Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exist disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.
Those 545 people and they alone are responsible. They and they alone have the power. They and they alone should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses – provided they have the gumption to manage their own employees.

h/t Liberty Pundits

Remember Charles Djou, that Republican guy in Hawaii that actually thought he’d have a shot at winning a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives from that deep blue state?

Well he won.

I know! Pretty cool, huh? I know a lot of my uber conservative friends are very excited. I’m excited too! I’m almost as excited as I was when Scott Brown won in Massachusetts. I mean, Republicans just don’t win in states like MA or HI.

Unfortunately, many conservatives were sorely disappointed when it turned out that Brown had some liberal leanings. They felt betrayed. I fear the same thing is going to happen with Djou followers.

To that I have this to say: Given the candidates in a general election, it is better to celebrate the victory of a candidate that will vote with you half of the time than bemoan the victory of someone that will never vote with you.

Congrats to Mr. Djou. The best of luck to you sir, and I hope that you’ll support many conservative caused during your time in Congress.

Here’s what he said:

“We have learned something very important since the days when I served in Vietnam…”

Here’s what he said he said after being caught saying what he said:

“On a few occasions, I have misspoken about my service…”

It kind of reminds me of the scene in The Emperor’s New Groove when Yzma & Kronck are locked in the closet looking for the emperor that had been turned into a llama.

“Tell us where the talking llama is and we’ll burn your house to the ground.”

“Don’t you mean ‘or’?”

“Uggghh! Tell us where the talking llama is or we’ll burn your house to the ground.”

“Well which is it? That seems like a pretty crucial conjunction.”

So Mr. Blumenthal, which is it – in or during? That’s a pretty crucial preposition.